I am only interested in historical wargaming. Does such a wargamer exist?
Yup, I discovered the other day when discussion turned to Warhammer 40k I zoned out completely. I'm not a wargamer, I am a historical wargamer. I really have no interest in sci-fi or fantasy wargaming. This is because my main interest is history. I love learning about history. I have no problem popping into any historical game even though I may know very little about the period.
78th Highlanders based out of Halifax, Canada in Estes Park, Colorado, USA (2004)
Within the historical wargaming hobby I find myself focused on actual historical battles rather than just a hypothetical battle. I'm sure lots of gamers have no problems having a DBA game between Ancient Chinese and Romans, but I find it a little off. Also, I like to try and paint my miniatures the most accurate as possible based on the resources I have access to. Other gamers, for example, have no problem painting a pre-dreadnought either the black and tan or white, where I have painted them grey. Sure the black and tan or white looks cooler, but grey in the battles was historic. I guess that makes me a hardcore historical wargamer. We all approach the hobby differently, which is okay.
I am not a fan of mixed wargaming content, like in a magazine. Some magazines for example have become dominated by non-historic articles. The mixed content is also prevalent in Podcasts. Am I going to listen through a one hour Podcast for a 10 minute discussion on a new historic ruleset with the rest being non-historic? Nope, no thanks.
I have no problems with sci-fi/fantasy gaming, I just don't have the time or brain power to filter through it to get to good historic wargaming material. 40k painters are great painters, better than I am, but I don't need to read/spend money on how to paint a Grey Knights army.
Maybe someday I'll get into Star Wars or Battletech gaming, but for now I continue to charge ahead with all sorts of historical wargaming projects.